[racket] #lang racket vs. racket/base

Oh, apparently the difference you're seeing is indeed racket/match. I see
that the contract system is already pulled in with those requires -- it is
bigger than racket/match. (You can see what libraries are indirectly loaded
by using DrRacket's View|Show Module Browser.)

Anyway, in the current git version (with the change to racket/date I
mentioned yesterday), I get 2.2M for the version without racket/date and
2.3 for the version with. But in 5.94, I see 3.9M for the version with
racket/date.

Robby



On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Manfred Lotz <manfred.lotz at arcor.de> wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:55:16 -0600
> Robby Findler <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like most of the size increase from racket/date is that you're
> > pulling in the contract system.
>
> No quite sure about this.
>
> I have
>
> #lang racket/base
>
> (require racket/cmdline
>           racket/string
>           racket/format
>           racket/port
>           racket/path
>           racket/list)
>
> which gives a size of 2123435 for the executable.
>
> I add one line
> (require racket/date)
> and the executable has size 4029647
>
> Is there something implicit happening with the contract system?
>
>
> --
> Manfred
>
>
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20140213/d64ebbdf/attachment.html>