[racket] on contract violation after adding 1471 strings to a BST

From: Daniel Bastos (dbastos at toledo.com)
Date: Tue Aug 5 16:45:18 EDT 2014

Thanks for pointing this out.

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matthias at ccs.neu.edu>
wrote:

> Warning: you switched from a teaching language to full Racket.
> The former would have caught this mistake, which is why we
> designed them for HtDP. Racket is for grown-up parenthesis
> eaters -- who want the behavior of cond that you just experienced,
> or so I am told. -- Matthias
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20140805/c5df2372/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.