[racket] Rosetta Sokoban Solution

From: J. Ian Johnson (ianj at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Mon Jun 10 13:26:06 EDT 2013

It could be less dense if he turned his comments into useless whitespace. Notice the lack of comments in most other submissions.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Felleisen" <matthias at ccs.neu.edu>
To: "Sean Kanaley" <skanaley at gmail.com>
Cc: "Racket Users" <users at racket-lang.org>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:42:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket] Rosetta Sokoban Solution

Thank you for this effort. 

This is not a criticism of your code but I will say that Racket code looks dense and overbearing compared to PicoLisp, Python, and Tcl. Hmph. 

On Jun 10, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Sean Kanaley wrote:

> The rather empty page on Sokoban now has a Racket solution.  The creator is proud to announce it's the fastest solution (though a couple didn't give run times) at ~0.1 seconds.  My thanks to Ryan Culpepper for making the binary heap that made this possible.
> http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Sokoban#Racket
> Also, Racket is one short of Python in popularity.  If someone could do two more we'll defeat those lazy Python programmers, probably with less work!
> ____________________
> Racket Users list:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

  Racket Users list:

Posted on the users mailing list.