| From: Patrick Useldinger (uselpa.list at gmail.com) Date: Sun Feb 10 14:29:42 EST 2013 |
|
On 10/02/2013 18:34, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > more). While Racket obviously inherits many traits from Scheme and while > we are obviously grateful to the Scheme branch of the family for its > inspiration, Racket is NOT Scheme and we will continue to develop the > language as we see fit. I'm happy to read that. We are all fans of the principles of Scheme and Lisp. But Racket is taking us so much further and deserves a road-map of its own. -Patrick
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}