[racket] testing impure stuff

If you don't have permissions, you can't recur and the current implementation throws an error w/o recourse to a fix. As Manfred points out, this is a 'fair weather' function. A real implementation should resist such external mishaps. But I also agree w/ you about the parameter. It would generalize this situation -- Matthias






On Dec 23, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Robby Findler wrote:

> Perhaps in-directory can take an optional parameter that controls whether or not to recur?
> 
> Robby
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> 
> On Dec 23, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Manfred Lotz <manfred.lotz at arcor.de> wrote:
> 
> > I think in-directory should be fixed in the long run.
> 
> Agreed. -- Matthias
> 
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20131223/00410728/attachment.html>