[racket] How to document a package and access its documentation

Oh, yeah? Well, I don't think it's appropriate to tell people when their
appropriateness is wrong at anything other than phase 0. ;)


On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:

> 20 minutes ago, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> > If someone implements a sandboxed way to build Scribble documentation,
> > then we can use it on everything. But that doesn't exist and it would
> > be hard to make by my estimation, so I don't think it's appropriate to
> > dream of it existing unless you have an idea on how to do it.
>
> It shouldn't be hard: one more `--sandboxed' flag or whatever, which
> when present makes the renderer switch to doing its work in a sandbox.
> The only thing that could be tricky is figuring out the permissions,
> but the renderer already knows where the source and the target are, so
> that shouldn't be a problem either.
>
> (ObMeta: I don't think that it's appropriate to tell people what
> dreams are appropriate.)
>
> --
>           ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                     http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
> ____________________
>   Racket Users list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20130812/1652c181/attachment-0001.html>