[racket] confusion about shadowing predefined functions in interactions window

From: Dan Grossman (djg at cs.washington.edu)
Date: Tue Oct 23 18:17:32 EDT 2012

Thanks, these emails explain things fairly clearly.

It's worth noting that as more functions get added to racket, it becomes
more likely to trip across this.  In particular, we hit this only because
range was added between 5.2 and 5.3.


On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Asumu Takikawa <asumu at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:

> On 2012-10-23 08:48:35 -0700, Dan Grossman wrote:
> >    Thanks, David.* I would be interested in someone walking through how
> this
> >    behavior arises -- as well as the design issue regarding the "hopeless
> >    top-level"
> A few months ago, I collected all of the instances of "the top-level is
> hopeless" that I could find from the archives and collected them here:
>   https://gist.github.com/3083053
> I think this e-mail in particular is relevant:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2008-September/027474.html
> Cheers,
> Asumu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20121023/f9dfc324/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.