[racket] Contracts and submodules

On Nov 30, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Greg Hendershott wrote:

>> This is a complete misunderstanding.
> 
> Sometimes I feel like a kid in the room while the adults are talking.
> When it comes to contracts, I have to stipulate that most of you are
> smarter than me and have thought about this longer than me.


Apologies. My opening wasn't meant to say "I am smarter" but I wanted
to send a strong message about define/contract. It really introduces a
boundary and in some strange sense your (possibly misleading) microbenchmark
exposes this constraint too. 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20121130/d9fc8869/attachment.p7s>