[racket] Racket vs Scheme, macros and new syntax

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 5 17:09:16 EST 2012

At Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:31:04 -0800, Scott Klarenbach wrote:
> In other words, Is Racket simply a philosophy/convention of language
> oriented programming with convenient syntactic wrappers to this end, or
> does it more fundamentally extend Scheme to do things technically *impossible
> *in that language?

The latter --- a more fundamental extension to Scheme.

Here's our most recent attempt to explain:


Posted on the users mailing list.