[racket] for*/list and Typed Racket

>
> Looking at this smaller example, I think that the nested recursion in
> expansion of `for*/list` is confusing Typed Racket.  I'll look into
> why that is, and if it can be fixed.  In the meantime, you ought to be
> able to rewrite the loop to use `for/fold:` and `reverse` to work
> around this issue.
>

Ok, I won't use for*/list: then.

Thanks a lot for your help, Sam