[racket] Splitting Racket source code by scope?

From: Danny Yoo (dyoo at cs.wpi.edu)
Date: Tue Feb 28 15:35:43 EST 2012

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Rüdiger Asche <rac at ruediger-asche.de> wrote:
> yes, but the docs for include also say that "If the source is not a complete
> path string, then path-spec is resolved relative to
> (current-load-relative-directory) if it is not #f, or relative to
> (current-directory) otherwise." Is that a documentation bug then?

What happens when you parameterize current-load-relative-directory,
instead of current-directory?

Posted on the users mailing list.