[racket] MzCOM poll

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 20 10:56:10 EST 2012

Does anyone use MzCOM, which makes Racket available as a COM object?

I would like to rename "MzCOM" to "RacketCOM", change its language from
`scheme' to `racket' (which mostly affects the way that results are
printed), and and change the ProgID, CLSID, and display name (which
MysterX treated as the "coclass" name).

We could keep MzCOM for compatibility if there is demand, but my guess
is that it will be ok to just drop MzCOM.

Posted on the users mailing list.