[racket] Math library ready for testing

Using this thread is fine, because I'm monitoring it closely.

If you're not sure whether some behavior is an error, email the list. 
Even if you're wrong, you're not wrong: if you misunderstood something, 
it's probably the documentation's fault. Also, other people probably 
misunderstood it in the same way, so resolving it in public is good.

Otherwise, submit a bug report. Here, the word "bug" means "bug the 
person responsible," which ensures the *error* will get fixed. :D

Neil ⊥

On 12/12/2012 09:35 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
> Should I use the bug reporting machinery for small things like this
> one, which I assume there will be a bunch in the new docs?
>
> Better a private mail to Neil?
>
> P.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toronto at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'll fix the type of `processor-count' and change the math docs.
>>
>> Neil ⊥
>>
>>
>> On 12/12/2012 08:16 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
>>>
>>> But it could be elided for the docs.
>>>
>>> Robby
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:33 AM, J. Ian Johnson <ianj at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I imagine that's there more for Typed Racket's sake.
>>>> -Ian
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Pierpaolo Bernardi" <olopierpa at gmail.com>
>>>> To: "Neil Toronto" <neil.toronto at gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: users at racket-lang.org
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:17:57 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
>>>> Eastern
>>>> Subject: Re: [racket] Math library ready for testing
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toronto at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just pushed the last commits that make the new math library ready
>>>>> for
>>>>> wider testing. Almost everything ready for use is documented, the tests
>>>>> keep
>>>>> passing, and everything *seems* to work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>           (max-math-threads) → Positive-Integer
>>>>           (max-math-threads num) → void?
>>>>             num : Positive-Integer
>>>>
>>>>           The maximum number of threads a parallelized math function will
>>>> use.
>>>>           The default value is (max 1 (processor-count))."
>>>>
>>>> Isn't (max 1 (processor-count)) the same as (processor-count) ?
>>>>
>>>> Or does Racket runs on machines with less than 1 processors?   8^)
>>>>
>>>> ____________________
>>>>     Racket Users list:
>>>>     http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>>
>>>> ____________________
>>>>     Racket Users list:
>>>>     http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________
>>>     Racket Users list:
>>>     http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>
>>
>> ____________________
>>   Racket Users list:
>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/users