[racket] interaction between in-cycle and in-value

If in-effect were a macro, you'd avoid the ugly lambda (). 


On Aug 3, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:

> 2012/8/3 Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu>:
>> More precisely, evaluation of the `in-value' call is evaluated once,
>> printing a dot and returning a sequence that contains #<void>.
> 
> Would it make sense to include an in-effect ?
> 
> https://github.com/soegaard/this-and-that/blob/master/heart-beat/in-effect.rkt
> 
> -- 
> Jens Axel Søgaard
> 
> ____________________
>  Racket Users list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20120803/5f4bcb18/attachment.p7s>