[racket] Clarification on licensing of Racket code?...

From: Neil Toronto (neil.toronto at gmail.com)
Date: Sun Apr 8 18:01:50 EDT 2012

On 04/08/2012 11:52 AM, namekuseijin wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Rüdiger Asche<rac at ruediger-asche.de>  wrote:
>> I regret that the discussion has taken this strange turn and the ridiculing
>> aspects, and I apologize for in parts being responsible for this
>> development.
>> This is not about me (or anybody else) having spare money to spend and
>> wanting to finance somebody's home theater out of questionable moral or
>> altruistic feelings.
> How can you be surprised that the discussion has taken "a strange turn
> and ridiculing aspects" when you yourself go on with ridiculous
> statements like that?
> I'm sure Oracle, IBM, Google, Amazon and several other don't spend
> spare money financing somebody's home linux theater:  they finance
> their own shared home linux theater.  Shared development, shared
> maintenance costs, profit for all.  Do you see the economic benefits?

Can you please try to not provoke Rüdiger into doing something he has 
just apologized for?

I agree with you more, and I would like to see my position advanced 

Neil ⊥

Posted on the users mailing list.