[racket] Racket style guide (was Re: Argument order conventions (was: Variable naming conventions))

From: Doug Williams (m.douglas.williams at gmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 22 13:05:34 EDT 2011

> Personally, I'd love to see even more of a separation between the header
> (data + provide) and the implementation. Perhaps I read too much Modula 2
> code, perhaps I liked units too much.
And, perhaps I wrote too much Ada code. I love the separation of the
specification (including the contract in the case of Racket) and the
implementation into separate files. There are many time that dependencies
lies only in the implementation and not in the specification of a module.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20110922/e9460be5/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.