[racket] Offtopic: Learning SML

From: Sam Phillips (samdphillips at gmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 20 23:10:49 EDT 2011

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:36, Grant Rettke <grettke at acm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> Over the years I've noticed on-list that comments are made about OCaml
> and Haskell and abstract data types.
> It seems like it would be fun to learn more about this stuff; and I
> guessed that learning SML would be a nice place to start because it is
> stable and seemed to be used by educators a lot.
> What do you think?
> Are _ML for the Working Programmer_ and _Elements of ML Programming,
> ML97_  a good place to start?

I'm surprised no one has mentioned _The Little MLer_ yet.



Posted on the users mailing list.