[racket] Quoted expressions in #lang racket

From: Ivanyi Peter (pivanyi at freemail.hu)
Date: Sun Sep 18 19:32:21 EDT 2011

Hi All, Just my two cents. :-) I am coming from the "original Lisp" point of view as well.At the beginning of the discussion I have not undertood any of the answers. They were"very cryptic" to me as well, but I have to say that these two papers made clear whatis the position of DrRacket and I understand this. I am not sure why these papers made itclear and the discussion did not. Sorry.I will even try to incorporate these into my own teaching and thinking. :-)I am still with DrRacket. :-))) Peter Ivanyi
Danny Yoo <dyoo at cs.wpi.edu> írta:
>    2.  Several people have given a justification for why the default
>in Racket prints things in a way that&#39;s different from what you&#39;re
>used to.  The difference is not accidental: it&#39;s there by design.  For
>example, you can see Section 3.3 of
>as well as Section 2.1 of Wadler&#39;s "Why Calculating is Better than
>Scheming" (http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/dat/miranda/wadler87.pdf)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20110919/f9879f47/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.