[racket] build-struct-generation

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Sat Sep 3 10:08:43 EDT 2011

At Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:58:57 -0400, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
> It would be good for b-s-g to cross-reference d-s/d (I see a
> define-struct/derived, not struct/derived) -- I wouldn't have found it
> from the docs alone.
> However, I am a little unclear on the value of d-s/d.  Is it solely to
> improve error messages?  For all other intents, is it equivalent to
> writing define-struct without that first syntax object argument?
> Perhaps a additional sentence in the docs to either confirm this or
> explain the difference would help.

Yes --- I'll adjust the docs.

Posted on the users mailing list.