[racket] check-fact would be nice...

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 14 14:25:18 EDT 2011

It's not consistency. It's pragmatic consistency that I am after. 

On Oct 14, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:

> I admire the consistency of this position - I really do - but we also have check-error.
> --
> Pardon terseness and mistakes -- sent from phone.

Posted on the users mailing list.