[racket] Implementing delimited continuations using a CPS transform

From: nicolas.oury at gmail.com (nicolas.oury at gmail.com)
Date: Thu Nov 24 09:52:50 EST 2011

> But you could also break the tail-call discipline of CPS and translate [shift e] as \k. (k [e](\x.x))
> Or you can use our 'abstract' continuations to manipulate a stack of continuations directly.

What are your 'abstract' continuations? Sounds very interesting.

Posted on the users mailing list.