[racket] rackunit positive feedback

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Tue May 17 09:09:05 EDT 2011

YES! That would also solve the problems with Kathy's test engine. Indeed, we could just replace test engine with rackunit in *sl. -- Matthias

On May 17, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:

> At Tue, 17 May 2011 08:57:26 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>> While we're at it: any chance of getting a test-on-entry-point for Rackunit as 
>> I described a while ago is available in Python? 
> I think we would want to implement it as a `#lang' mix-in
> #lang testable racket
> ...
> where `testable' extends the module's runtime configuration to run
> tests. The runtime configuration action is used only when the module is
> the main module of a program (e.g., run via `racket -t').
> I don't think there current runtime-configuration hook is enough,
> though. It supports a pre-`require' configuration, but `testable' would
> need some sort of port-`require' action.

Posted on the users mailing list.