[racket] rackunit (success)

From: Noel Welsh (noelwelsh at gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 20 12:04:29 EDT 2011

You're correct, there is no success function in Rackunit. This will do:

(lambda () 'ok)

I.e. you don't need to signal success for a test to pass. People have
experimented with test frameworks where you have to signal success,
but it the general conclusion is that it's too much effort for the
small gain.


> But, the second check would be nicer as (success "not found"), but I
> don't see a "success" check. It is my first time using rackunit, so
> maybe I'm overlooking something.

Posted on the users mailing list.