[racket] Again on bindings visibility in eval

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Thu Jul 14 15:37:27 EDT 2011

On Jul 14, 2011, at 3:32 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:

> (let ([tmp 4]) (or #f tmp)) --should-be-> 4
> This side is easy to fix using gensyms.  

Except that even old Lisp guys forget, get it wrong, whatever. Nothing's easy ;-) 

Posted on the users mailing list.