[racket] Efficiency of tight loops in Racket

I think the real reason is actually much sadder: no one on the core
team regularly uses windows. Well, until about a month ago, when I
started using windows for my development tasks so hopefully that'll
change.

But I'm not sure what Jos is observing and I was expecting a reply
from Kevin or Matthew on this -- places are still pretty experimental.

Robby

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Noel Welsh <noelwelsh at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've seen lots of recent commits dealing w/ Windows 7 / 64-bit
> support, so I expect it is simply time. Windows is not as developer
> friendly as Unix so likely to receive new features last (as a guess).
>
> N.
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Jos Koot <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:
>> Is there a specific reason why there is no parallel support for place on a
>> dual core processor with Windows 7.
>> Thanks, Jos
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>