[racket] Efficiency of tight loops in Racket

From: Noel Welsh (noelwelsh at gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jan 15 02:34:06 EST 2011

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Harry Spier <harryspier at hotmail.com> wrote:
> From whats been said perhaps the way to go is to make a C wrapper to the C
> interface to the latest version of ImageMagick and then go through the FFI
> to interface to Racket.

I doubt you need that C wrapper. The ImageMagick API is large but
fairly straightforward IIRC. You should be able to wrap the bits you
want directly.


Posted on the users mailing list.