[racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!

From: Racket Noob (racketnoob at hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 19 18:29:54 EST 2011

ok, ok, please, don't be so pedantic. In the correspondence I've told you a little about yourself. And that's what I meant when I said that you already know some details about me... But that's irrelevant anyway. What is relevant is that the mass-production continues... and that goes hand in hand with negligible use of racket in practice. : (
 Subject: Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!
From: matthias at ccs.neu.edu
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:23:38 -0500
CC: users at racket-lang.org
To: racketnoob at hotmail.com




That doesn't me I know you. I provided advice on a solution to a book problem, and that's that. 

On Dec 19, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Racket Noob wrote:
Yes, You, professor: some time ago I was asked you to rate my solution for "Peg Solitaire" and once again thank you for your help and kindness!
 
Subject: Re: [racket] FW: Racket documentation for web development is just awful!
From: matthias at ccs.neu.edu
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:10:13 -0500
CC: users at racket-lang.org
To: racketnoob at hotmail.com


On Dec 19, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Racket Noob wrote:Mr. Matthis already knows some details about my "psychopathological" profile.

Me? 

 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20111220/09f8efb6/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.