[racket] Multiple return values

From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt (samth at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 15 18:08:26 EST 2011

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toronto at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 05:03 AM, Markku Rontu wrote:
>> Named return values, ah the dream of symmetry.
> I think my mad-scientist advisor did something like this once. I think it
> would be awesome to have this, and of course keyword arguments, as
> first-class constructs in Racket.

What would be the advantage of having keyword arguments implemented
the `compile' step, as opposed to implemented in the `expand' step as
they are now?
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu

Posted on the users mailing list.