[racket] future

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Tue Aug 30 10:18:53 EDT 2011

I can see a Haskellian, a Cleaner-upper, or a Cameleer impose the no-macros-for-thunks rule. They have always claimed that there is no need to avoid the repetition of (lambda () because it is so short. When you can't do it, just say it ain't necessary. Better, say it's bad. -- Matthias

Posted on the users mailing list.