[racket] Problem with macro

From: Casey Klein (clklein at eecs.northwestern.edu)
Date: Fri Aug 12 08:49:57 EDT 2011

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> Unfortunately, that position in a 'case' expression is not a place
> where macro expansion happens. You can, however, use a 'cond' instead
> of 'case'.

But you still can't use a macro like `process-state' to generate an
entire `cond' clause (i.e., the question part AND the answer part).

Posted on the users mailing list.