[racket] Box: When and why?

From: Raoul Duke (raould at gmail.com)
Date: Fri Oct 22 13:52:59 EDT 2010

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk at cs.brown.edu> wrote:
> There is no STM in Racket, so I don't see the relation.  In a
> transactional world, you need to know what "that" means.  In Racket,
> there's no cleverness.
> The refs in Clojure may be more akin to the boxes in FrTime.

ah! thanks for the help in clarifying my muddy mind :)

Posted on the users mailing list.