| From: Raoul Duke (raould at gmail.com) Date: Fri Oct 22 13:52:59 EDT 2010 |
|
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk at cs.brown.edu> wrote: > There is no STM in Racket, so I don't see the relation. In a > transactional world, you need to know what "that" means. In Racket, > there's no cleverness. > > The refs in Clojure may be more akin to the boxes in FrTime. ah! thanks for the help in clarifying my muddy mind :)
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}