[racket] Fundamentals

From: Mathew Kurian (bluejamesbond at gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 13 23:15:59 EDT 2010

In response to synx and Professor Bloch:
As long as the processor can only read only numbers (binary), Racket cannot
be interpreted by the machine before being translated into another language
such as Assembly. Assembly is then translated to numbers or binary/machine
code If that is the case, Racket has to be an interpreted language since it
is layered on Assembly. Or I may just be completely wrong in my perception
of that part.

In response to Professor Bloch:
How can those researched numbers be random? It can only LOOK random, but not
ACTUALLY random. Right?

Mathew Kurian

Mathew Kurian
Seven Lakes High School
Cell: 8324932862 | Home: 2814929526
Do all the good you can, by all the means you can,
In all the ways you can, in all the places you can,
At all the times you can, to all the people you can,
As long as ever you can." :) John Wesley
*Please be sure to visit SLHS Red Cross Association<http://www.slhsredcross.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20101013/6dead404/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.