[racket] letoverlambda

From: Jos Koot (jos.koot at telefonica.net)
Date: Sat Nov 20 14:25:06 EST 2010

Having read some of the stuff, l am not impressed. Yes, in some cases we may
want to introduce a binding not named in a macro call. Racket and R6RS
(macro-case) do that very well. That for a beginner it is difficult to
prepare unhegienic macros: jolly good! I have misused datum->syntax a couple
of times, just to find out later that I did not need it realy (although I
recognize that in some cases it may be usefull)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at racket-lang.org 
> [mailto:users-bounces at racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Matthias Felleisen
> Sent: 20 November 2010 17:08
> To: Robby Findler
> Cc: Carl Eastlund; users at racket-lang.org
> Subject: Re: [racket] letoverlambda
> On Nov 20, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> > Good thing we're not Scheme anymore.
> :-) You think that guy would believe you? 
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Posted on the users mailing list.