[plt-scheme] (provide ...) question

From: Todd O'Bryan (toddobryan at gmail.com)
Date: Tue May 18 16:13:14 EDT 2010

Wow. Now that's service!

As a workaround, I was going to try require-ing and then
re-provide-ing the struct stuff. It adds an extra module level, but
should that theoretically work?


On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Stevie Strickland <sstrickl at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> On May 18, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Stevie Strickland wrote:
>> On May 18, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>>> I think this is a (known) bug in define-struct/contract.
>> Matthias is correct (if you're interested, it's bug #10561).  I'm working on some changes and fixes in the contract system that should fix this problem as well.  I don't have an ETA of when that work will land, though it'll be after the next release.
> This morning I wrote a fix that I can put into place now.  It's now fixed in git, and will be part of the next release.
> Stevie

Posted on the users mailing list.