[racket] current backtrace implications of JIT

From: Neil Van Dyke (neil at neilvandyke.org)
Date: Sun Jun 27 23:38:51 EDT 2010

Thanks, Matthew.  Sounds like I should experiment with my application 
and try to break JIT backtraces with 4.2.5.  Hopefully they just work 
for me (and in production), because the JIT would be a big win for us.

Matthew Flatt wrote at 06/27/2010 11:23 PM:
> The difference between JIT and non-JIT backtraces usually isn't so big. Assuming that it's still a problem (i.e., it wasn't on x86_64 and long enough ago), then probably we need to fix something in the JIT backtrace implementation.


Posted on the users mailing list.