[racket] scoping rules and define-for-syntax

On Jul 24, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
> [...]
> 
> This, however, is just an illustrative simplification of my real
> program, which has non-trivial mutually-referential functions.  The
> only solution I have is effectively
> 
>   (define-for-syntax (shell e)
> 
>     (define (f1 e) ...)
>     (define (f3 e) ...)
> 
>     (f3 e))
> 
> which works, but is pretty unsatisfactory.

(See also PR7104 -- it was an issue in the ffi code, which I worked
around with a parameter...)

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!