[racket] comments requested from users of SXML and PLT xexprs

Thanks for your comments, Eli.  I am still wavering on whether to do the 
permissive thing.  And I am also looking at whether Typed Scheme and/or 
"html-template" make the permissiveness less useful than before.  
Permissiveness sure does make some things harder to implement and more 
computationally expensive.

>> [...] However, I have come up with what I think are some improvements to SXML, such as [...] attribute value composition [...]
>>     
>
> Is this aimed at the problem of combining `style' attributes?  If so, can you say more on what you did for that?
>   

I was speaking of named and numeric character entity references in 
attribute values, which are supported in some versions of XML and HTML.  
"Composition" was a poor choice of term on the Racket email list.

I'm not sure what you mean by "combining `style' attributes".  Is that a 
transform rather than a representation/linguistic issue?

-- 
http://www.neilvandyke.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20101222/b801f4c6/attachment.html>