[racket] question about foldl implementation

From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt (samth at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Fri Aug 13 16:04:48 EDT 2010

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Joe Marshall <jmarshall at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> It seems to me that the Haskell version is better.

The Haskell ordering also has the advantage of fitting with the Typed
Racket type system for variable-arity functions.
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu

Posted on the users mailing list.