[racket] Macros as a first class objects?

From: The Configurator (configurator at gmail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 13 05:31:52 EDT 2010

There must be great reasons why this would be horribly wrong, but why
shouldn't macros and syntaxes be passed as first class objects, method
parameters, return values etc.?

Note that I'm asking why it shouldn't and not why it's not. I'm talking
about the theoretical possibility, not an actual implementation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20100813/8e4594fa/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.