[racket] syntax, differently

From: Jos Koot (jos.koot at telefonica.net)
Date: Mon Aug 2 10:42:41 EDT 2010

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at racket-lang.org 
> [mailto:users-bounces at racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Horace Dynamite
> Sent: 02 August 2010 16:31
> To: Robby Findler; users at racket-lang.org
> Subject: Re: [racket] syntax, differently
> > That said, if you hit return after each 'cond' (instead of 
> keeping the 
> > first clause on the same line), you're down to 82 chars. If 
> you break 
> > define definitions in the innermost local, you're below the 
> limit. I 
> > personally would probably also put a return after the call to 
> > make-state, getting me to this, at 74 cols in the widest line.
> Okay, you win!
> Having analyzed over 40 sections of code from HtDP using the 
> find command, I only found 6 instances where I'd gone over 
> the 80 character limit (comments and #reader(lib ...) stuff 
> greped out).
> So I suppose I was being a little too aggressive at the 
> suggestion. I do wonder how tricky it will be do have a 
> line-breaking routine that can take as input the program I 
> posted, and produce as output the program you returned.

I once had such a program, but I never used it. Don't know whether or not I
can retrieve it from archives.

> Thanks for your time.
> Horace.
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Posted on the users mailing list.