[plt-scheme] Paren Paralysis Sufferers Unite

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> It seems okay to me when I'm writing new code, but less good when I'm
> editing existing code since the parens often go around non-emptyness.
> But perhaps I've just missed some other binding somewhere that makes
> that work well or something.

It sounds like binding ( to insert-()-pair would give you what you
want in both cases (surrounding code or inserting matched round
parens) or maybe I don't understand he use case.