| From: Stevie Strickland (sstrickl at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Mon Nov 30 12:58:28 EST 2009 |
|
On Nov 30, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Synx wrote: > Signature contracts are useful, but the language 'signature' doesn't > support them, and it's also useful. The fact that 'signature' doesn't support signature contracts is just a bug, and thus I will fix that. Sorry, there's an existing PR about this, but for some reason I never picked it up, and thus it slipped off my radar. Stevie
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}