[plt-scheme] 12.4.2 word definition; is this OK?

From: Grant Rettke (grettke at acm.org)
Date: Tue May 12 21:33:23 EDT 2009

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Felix Klock's PLT scheme proxy
<pltscheme at pnkfx.org> wrote:
> Grant's original question was: "Is this definition of word OK?"
> ...
> I would say that Grant should clarify his data definition by either
> explicitly referring to a different class like Letter which consists
> (solely) of the 26 symbols of interest, *or* Grant should remove the
> parenthetical.

Got it. Thanks guys.

Posted on the users mailing list.