| From: namekuseijin (namekuseijin at gmail.com) Date: Fri Jun 12 17:08:23 EDT 2009 |
|
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Neil Van Dyke<neil at neilvandyke.org> wrote: > namekuseijin wrote at 06/12/2009 04:47 PM: >> >> Fact is: do *is* named let, only more convenient and a bit more limited. >> > > I disagree. People are free to use "do", just as people are free to eat > paste, but neither practice should be advocated . more like pasta! yum... :)
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}