[plt-scheme] Not so hygienic macros?

From: michael rice (nowgate at yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Dec 29 15:55:54 EST 2009

Dang! I know I checked that along the way but there was indeed still an extra blank there.



--- On Tue, 12/29/09, Robby Findler <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:

From: Robby Findler <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>
Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] Not so hygienic macros?
To: "michael rice" <nowgate at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Shriram Krishnamurthi" <sk at cs.brown.edu>, "plt-scheme" <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
Date: Tuesday, December 29, 2009, 3:39 PM

On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:48 PM, michael rice <nowgate at yahoo.com> wrote:
> OK, I'm using #lang scheme and the Module language now.
> But I'm still getting an extra blank inserted when I replace MATCH with MMATCH (see MMATCH- FIRST below). Is the replace function supposed to work this way?

It only does that for me when I put an extra space in the replace
field. Maybe you need to explain what you're doing in more detail and
it will help.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20091229/1c8c28c6/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.