[plt-scheme] ->d Performance

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Sat Apr 11 16:58:53 EDT 2009

I second that. Indeed, I consider your kind of programs
ideal candidates for just this kind of partial conversion.

Still, we're also looking for 'heavy' contract candidates
that benefit from parallel contract checking. Yours seems
the right kind

-- Matthias

On Apr 11, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Robby Findler wrote:

> Popping out one level, this kind of use of contracts (roughly: on
> field accessors) is one of the places where I know that they can have
> a non-trivial impact on the overall running time of an application.
> The best suggestion I can make for now is to either use Typed Scheme
> or to move the contracts onto higher-level abstractions that get
> called less frequently.
> Sorry,
> Robby
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme

Posted on the users mailing list.