# [plt-scheme] Re: Scheme workshop survey

On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Richard Cleis <rcleis at me.com> wrote:
>* Does the following progression make sense, by ordinary standards of
*>* Ameringlish?
*>*
*>* (car '((a b c) x y z)) is '(a b c)
*>*
*>* The value of (car '((a b c) x y z)) is (a b c)
*
Not to me.
(a b c)
is an expression, not a value. It may also be the print
representation chosen by some particular implementation for some
particular value, but then so is
/---+---+---\
| a | b | c |
\---+---+---/
(Do you see my point?)
Shriram