[plt-scheme] eq-hash-code

From: Jon Zeppieri (zeppieri at gmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 7 19:35:32 EDT 2008

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> But it is always true that (= k j) implies (eq? k j) purely by
> definition of = and eq?.

But that's not true.
The text you quoted is basically saying (in implementation terms),
that the result will always be a fixnum.

Posted on the users mailing list.