[plt-scheme] Re: PLT R6RS questions and answers

From: kbohdan at mail.ru (kbohdan at mail.ru)
Date: Thu Nov 27 11:20:53 EST 2008

Alex Shinn wrote:
 > This is obviously a rough graph and the distances are
 > debatable - it's my own view of things skewed quite heavily
 > by the experience I've had writing portable R5RS libraries.

Just curious, what is your vision on the future of "Programming
Language Scheme" ? Is there any chance to make it real-world PL ?
Do you think that current state of standardization is acceptable ?
If not, what would you propose to improve it ?


Posted on the users mailing list.