[plt-scheme] Re: R6RS Interoperability

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 26 13:44:53 EDT 2008

At Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:56:53 +0000 (UTC), Tom Gordon wrote:
>  In the meantime, I wonder whether it wouldn't be preferable to make all
>  pairs and lists immutable, also in R6RS code.   This wouldn't seem to
>  make PLT an incorrect implementation of R6RS, only a little bit
>  incomplete, by not yet supporting one of the standard libraries, (rnrs
>  mutable-pairs).

FWIW, supporting an "R6RS but with immutable pairs" language is part of
the plan:


But we haven't gotten there, yet.


Posted on the users mailing list.